Correlation in Parlays: Same-Game Parlay Math

Editor's Note: Riding a Heater is an educational site. The information provided is for educational purposes only and does not constitute betting advice. All betting involves risk. Please bet responsibly.

Same-Game Parlays (SGPs) have exploded in popularity, becoming a flagship offering for nearly every major sportsbook. They offer the tantalizing prospect of turning a small stake into a massive payout by combining multiple outcomes from a single contest. But behind the flashy odds and seemingly simple concept lies a complex mathematical reality that every serious bettor should understand: correlation.

Unlike traditional parlays that combine bets from different games, the legs of an SGP are often related. A quarterback throwing for a lot of yards is related to his team scoring points. A star receiver catching a touchdown is related to the game's total points going over. This interconnectedness, or correlation, fundamentally changes how odds are calculated. Sportsbooks don't just multiply the odds of each leg together; they use sophisticated models to account for these relationships, which often results in a higher house edge than many players realize.

This article dives deep into the mathematics of correlation in same-game parlays. We will explore how traditional parlays are priced, why that math breaks down for SGPs, and the advanced methods sportsbooks use to calculate SGP odds. By the end, you will have a clear understanding of positive and negative correlation, the concept of "hidden juice," and how to be a more informed SGP bettor. We will also provide practical examples and link to helpful resources like our Odds Calculator [blocked] and Bankroll Tracker [blocked] to help you apply these concepts.

The Simplicity of Traditional Parlays: A World of Independence

Before we can understand the complexity of same-game parlays, we must first grasp the straightforward mathematics behind traditional parlays. A traditional parlay combines two or more bets from different games. The critical assumption here is that the outcomes are independent events. This means the result of one game has absolutely no bearing on the result of another.

Because the events are independent, calculating the total odds of the parlay is simple: you just multiply the decimal odds of each individual leg together. If you're working with American odds, you first need to convert each leg into its implied probability.

Let's walk through an example. Suppose you want to place a 3-leg parlay on three different NFL games:

• Leg 1: Green Bay Packers -7.5 (-110)
• Leg 2: Kansas City Chiefs Moneyline (-200)
• Leg 3: Over 45.5 points in the Bills vs. Dolphins game (-110)

First, we convert the American odds for each leg into their implied probabilities:

• Leg 1 (-110): 110 / (110 + 100) = 0.5238 or 52.38%
• Leg 2 (-200): 200 / (200 + 100) = 0.6667 or 66.67%
• Leg 3 (-110): 110 / (110 + 100) = 0.5238 or 52.38%

To find the probability of all three legs winning, we multiply their individual probabilities:

0.5238 * 0.6667 * 0.5238 = 0.1834

So, the true probability of this parlay hitting is approximately 18.34%. The fair odds for this parlay would be (1 / 0.1834) = 5.45 in decimal odds, or +445 in American odds. However, the sportsbook will offer a slightly lower payout, which is how they create their house edge. This simple, transparent calculation is only possible because the outcome of the Packers game doesn't influence the Chiefs game or the total in the Bills-Dolphins game. This fundamental assumption of independence is completely shattered when we enter the world of same-game parlays.

The Correlation Conundrum: When Outcomes Are Linked

In a same-game parlay, the legs are inherently linked. The outcomes are not independent, and this is where the math gets tricky. This relationship between the legs of a parlay is known as correlation. Correlation can be positive or negative.

Positive Correlation

Positive correlation is when two outcomes are more likely to happen together. If one event occurs, the probability of the second event occurring increases. Here are some classic examples in an NFL game:

• Quarterback Passing Yards and Receiver Receiving Yards: If you bet on Patrick Mahomes to throw for over 300 yards and Travis Kelce to have over 80 receiving yards, these bets are positively correlated. For Kelce to get his yards, Mahomes has to throw him the ball.
• Team to Win and Game Total Over: If a team is a heavy favorite, their win is often positively correlated with the game total going over. A dominant offensive performance usually leads to both a win and a high score.

When legs in an SGP are positively correlated, the true odds of the parlay hitting are higher than what a simple multiplication of the individual odds would suggest. Sportsbooks know this, and they adjust the payout downwards to account for this increased likelihood.

Negative Correlation

Negative correlation is the opposite: when two outcomes are less likely to happen together. If one event occurs, the probability of the second event occurring decreases. Examples include:

• Game Total Under and a Kicker to Score Over 8.5 Points: A low-scoring game (under) is negatively correlated with a kicker having a high-scoring day. Kickers get most of their points in games that stall in the red zone, leading to lots of field goal attempts, or in high-scoring games with many extra points.
• One Team's Moneyline and the Opposing Quarterback's Passing Yards Over: If you bet on the Buffalo Bills to win, but also on the opposing quarterback to throw for over 300 yards, these bets are likely negatively correlated. A quarterback having a great day often leads to his team winning, not losing.

When an SGP includes negatively correlated legs, the true odds of it hitting are lower than a simple multiplication would imply. In these rare cases, a sportsbook might offer a slightly better payout than a standard parlay, but these are much less common.

Because of these complex relationships, sportsbooks cannot use the simple, transparent math of traditional parlays. Instead, they rely on sophisticated models to price SGPs, which we will explore next.

The Black Box: How Sportsbooks Price Same-Game Parlays

So, if they can't just multiply the odds, how do sportsbooks calculate SGP payouts? The answer lies in proprietary algorithms that analyze vast amounts of historical data to model the correlation between different events. While the exact formulas are closely guarded secrets, they are based on established statistical methods.

1. Correlation Matrices

The foundation of SGP pricing is the correlation matrix. This is a massive table that quantifies the relationship between thousands of different statistical categories. For every pair of potential bets (e.g., Team A winning and Player X scoring a touchdown, Player Y's rushing yards and the game total), the sportsbook has a correlation coefficient, a value typically between -1 and 1.

• A coefficient close to +1 indicates a strong positive correlation.
• A coefficient close to -1 indicates a strong negative correlation.
• A coefficient close to 0 indicates little to no correlation.

Here is a simplified, hypothetical correlation matrix for an NFL game:

This matrix shows that the quarterback throwing for over 2.5 touchdowns has a strong positive correlation (+0.55) with the game total going over, which makes intuitive sense. When the sportsbook prices an SGP with these two legs, it will use this coefficient to adjust the payout significantly downwards from what a simple parlay calculation would suggest.

2. Gaussian Copula Method

One of the advanced statistical tools used to model these complex dependencies is the Gaussian copula. In simple terms, a copula is a function that describes the relationship between a set of variables. The Gaussian copula allows the sportsbook to take the individual probabilities of each leg (the "marginals") and then "join" them together using a correlation matrix to create a joint probability distribution. This distribution gives them the true probability of all the legs of the SGP hitting simultaneously.

This method is powerful because it separates the individual probabilities from the dependency structure. This allows the sportsbook to adjust the pricing based on the specific combination of bets in the SGP, accurately reflecting the underlying correlations.

3. Empirical Frequency Adjustments

Another, more direct method is to rely on empirical frequency. Sportsbooks have databases of tens of thousands of past games. They can simply query their data to see how often a specific combination of events has occurred in the past. For example, they can look at all games where a team was a 7-point favorite and the total was 48, and then see what percentage of those games resulted in the favorite winning, their quarterback throwing for 300+ yards, and the total going over.

This data-driven approach provides a real-world check on the theoretical models and allows the sportsbook to fine-tune their pricing based on actual historical results.

Practical Implications: The "Hidden Juice" in SGPs

The result of these complex calculations is that the odds for an SGP are almost always lower than for a traditional parlay with the same number of legs at the same individual prices. This difference is often referred to as the "hidden juice" or the additional house edge that is baked into SGP pricing.

Let's consider a simple 2-leg SGP:

• Leg 1: Kansas City Chiefs Moneyline (-200)
• Leg 2: Travis Kelce to score a touchdown (+150)

If this were a traditional parlay, the odds would be +300. However, because these two events are positively correlated (if the Chiefs win, it's more likely that one of their best players, Kelce, scored), the sportsbook will offer a lower payout, perhaps +250. That difference between +300 and +250 is the price you pay for the correlation.

While SGPs can be a fun way to engage with a game, it's crucial to understand that you are generally paying a premium for that entertainment. The house edge on SGPs is significantly higher than on straight bets and even traditional parlays. However, this doesn't mean they should be avoided entirely. An informed bettor who understands correlation can still find value, or at least make more educated decisions.

For example, you can use your own knowledge of the game to find situations where you believe the sportsbook's correlation model is wrong. Perhaps you think a team will win a low-scoring game, a scenario that is often negatively correlated. If you can find SGPs that combine these types of contrarian outcomes, you may be able to find value.

To help you explore these concepts further, we encourage you to use our Odds Calculator [blocked] to see how parlay odds are calculated and our Bankroll Tracker [blocked] to manage your funds responsibly when experimenting with complex bets like SGPs.

Conclusion: Betting Smarter in the Age of SGPs

Same-game parlays are a testament to the sophistication of modern sports betting. They are a complex product, priced using advanced mathematical models that account for the intricate web of correlations within a single game. While they offer the allure of high payouts, they also come with a higher house edge that is often not immediately apparent to the average bettor.

By understanding the concepts of positive and negative correlation, and by appreciating the mathematical work that goes into pricing these bets, you can become a more informed and discerning consumer. You can recognize why certain SGP payouts are lower than you might expect and begin to identify spots where the market might be over or under-estimating a particular correlation.

Ultimately, the key is to remember that betting should be a form of entertainment. SGPs can enhance your viewing experience, but it's essential to bet with your head, not over it. Always bet responsibly, manage your bankroll wisely, and never wager more than you are willing to lose.